ProfileLeslie Barry
BasedMelbourne, Australia
RoleIndependent advisor · Founder, Exponentially
ReJudgment before implementation

I help enterprise leaders decide which AI bets deserve another dollar. My work sits before implementation: map the portfolio, test the assumptions, gather behavioural evidence, and make a defensible call on what to fund, fix, or kill.

I sell no build and no software. Your team or chosen delivery partner builds the winners. That independence matters because my recommendation cannot become my implementation revenue.

Leslie Barry, independent AI strategy advisor
Independent advice · Melbourne
4,000+experiments run with client teams
$68M+generated and saved for clients
50+enterprise teams
2017Exponentially founded in Melbourne

Operating position

Independent by design

Most AI advice arrives attached to a roadmap, platform, or delivery team. Mine ends with a decision. I work for the executive answerable for the result, not for the vendor proposing the build.

The work is practical: compare competing bets on one page, identify what must be true for each to pay off, and get customer or employee behaviour into the decision before the budget is committed.

The record

I have sat on both sides of the funding decision

I built companies, ran innovation inside large organisations, and then founded Exponentially. That operating history is why I care less about how persuasive an idea sounds and more about what it can prove before the expensive part begins.

Before 2017

Built four companies, sold two, then ran innovation inside ThoughtWorks Australia and Sportsbet.

2017

Founded Exponentially to help enterprise teams test whether ideas deserve capital before they build.

2020 to 2024

Worked with 50+ enterprise teams and trained more than 1,000 practitioners across 200+ workshops.

2021 onward

Guest lectured in the Stanford course where Pretotyping is taught.

Now

Advise executives on AI portfolios, applying behavioural evidence to every fund, fix, or kill decision.

Pretotyping

The method behind my work was created at Google by Alberto Savoia and is taught at Stanford. I trained directly with Alberto and guest lecture in the Stanford course where he teaches it.

Governance

I sit on the PHORIA board and trained with the Australian Institute of Company Directors. The goal is not only a better experiment. It is a decision an executive can defend.

How I work

Evidence first. Verdict second. Build last.

The sequence is deliberately simple. It keeps the cost of being wrong low and makes stopping a normal capital-allocation decision rather than a political failure.

i.

Map the bets

Put every live and proposed AI investment on one page, with an owner, expected value, and next funding decision.

ii.

Expose the assumptions

Separate what the organisation knows from what it hopes, especially around adoption, behaviour, and measurable value.

iii.

Test before build

Run the smallest behavioural experiment that can change the funding decision while being wrong is still cheap.

iv.

Issue the verdict

Fund, fix, or kill each bet, with the evidence attached and the next threshold agreed in advance.

Public record

Follow the evidence, not the biography

These are the pages I would use to check the claims above: client outcomes, public sessions, third-party profiles, and material you can watch or use.

“Leslie has a deeply purposeful connection to the pretotyping philosophy, and he has done amazing work in industrialising the training, tools and methodologies to truly bring pretotyping to life.”

Scott Thomson · Head of Innovation & Customer Engineering, Google · Source

“The students love the class. They applied pretotyping to test their assumptions before designing their MVPs.”

Edison Tse · Associate Professor, Stanford University · Source

Watch and learn

See the method, not just the claims

Leslie’s free Pretotyping course links each lesson to its YouTube video, with practical examples and exercises.

Next step

Bring me the AI bet you are least sure about

In a short call, you will get my honest read on what it needs to prove and whether an AI Bets Audit is a useful next step. No implementation pitch.